WFPAX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
WFPAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jul 31, 2007. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 3.09% | 5.81% | 11.58% | 9.17% | -4.95% | 28.14% | 2.93% | 39.96% | -13.42% | 10.82% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFPAX achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WFPAX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
WFPAX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFPAX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WFPAX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
WFPAX
HWMIX
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFPAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.65 | 0.93 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 1.41 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.35 | -0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 5.49 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFPAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 0.93 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.36 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between WFPAX and HWMIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
WFPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFPAX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A | 11.04% | 11.38% | 7.97% | 5.39% | 8.69% | 9.86% | 0.36% | 7.38% | 2.40% | 4.14% | 1.08% | 4.14% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFPAX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFPAX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFPAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.20% | -69.84% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.57% | -16.87% | +5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -25.90% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.81% | -63.21% | +19.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -3.32% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.99% | -10.89% | +1.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.32% | 4.15% | -0.83% |
Volatility
WFPAX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund - Class A (WFPAX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that WFPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WFPAX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 4.30% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.53% | 12.42% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 23.86% | -6.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 22.34% | -5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 25.62% | -6.72% |