PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFMIX vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFMIX vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFMIX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WFMIX has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 10.85%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.


WFMIX

1D
1.45%
1M
3.68%
YTD
10.59%
6M
9.07%
1Y
16.75%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
7.84%
10Y*
10.85%

PG

1D
0.86%
1M
5.18%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.28%
1Y
-5.68%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFMIX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.59%6.14%11.95%9.54%-4.65%28.53%3.27%40.27%-13.12%11.16%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.93%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WFMIX and PG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2005

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between WFMIX and PG has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFMIX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFMIX
WFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
WFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
WFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFMIX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFMIXPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.97

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.37

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

-0.68

+6.59

WFMIX vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFMIX and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFMIX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFMIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFMIX and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFMIXPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.70%

-54.25%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-15.52%

+5.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-21.15%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

-23.77%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

-23.77%

-20.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-13.29%

+12.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-12.16%

+4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

8.80%

-5.87%

Volatility

WFMIX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) is 4.41%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that WFMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFMIXPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

6.99%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.78%

15.01%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.16%

18.78%

-4.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

17.82%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

19.05%

-0.14%

Dividends

WFMIX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

WFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.85%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
WFMIX
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I
10.17%11.24%8.00%5.51%8.71%9.87%0.66%7.48%2.74%4.41%1.44%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFMIX and PG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to WFMIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFMIX dropped -52.70% vs PG's -54.25%.

WFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFMIX and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer