WFMIX vs. PG
WFMIX (Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I) is Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Allspring Global Investments, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, WFMIX returned 10.85%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for PG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WFMIX vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFMIX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, WFMIX has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 10.85%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
WFMIX
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 3.68%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 9.07%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.84%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
WFMIX vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.59% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -5.05% | 20.52% | 14.15% | 39.70% | 3.57% | 12.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFMIX and PG is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2005 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WFMIX and PG has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFMIX vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
WFMIX
PG
WFMIX vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFMIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | -0.37 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | -0.68 | +6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFMIX vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFMIX drawdown since its inception was -52.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFMIX and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFMIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.70% | -54.25% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -15.52% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.30% | -21.15% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.13% | -23.77% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.80% | -23.77% | -20.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -13.29% | +12.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -12.16% | +4.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 8.80% | -5.87% |
Volatility
WFMIX vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) is 4.41%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that WFMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFMIX | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 6.99% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.78% | 15.01% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.16% | 18.78% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 17.82% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 19.05% | -0.14% |
Dividends
WFMIX vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
WFMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.17% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFMIX and PG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to WFMIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFMIX dropped -52.70% vs PG's -54.25%.
WFMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WFMIX and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer