WFHY vs. BPH
WFHY (WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WFHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the WisdomTree Fundamental U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. WFHY is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFHY charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
WFHY vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WFHY
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.17%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
BPH
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFHY vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WFHY WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 0.17% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 3.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFHY and BPH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFHY vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
WFHY
BPH
WFHY vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFHY | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.61 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFHY | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 9.79 | -9.18 |
Drawdowns
WFHY vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFHY and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFHY | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.74% | -2.35% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -0.93% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | — | — |
Volatility
WFHY vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFHY | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 23.51% | -19.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.57% | 23.51% | -15.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.20% | 23.51% | -15.31% |
WFHY vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFHY vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
WFHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFHY WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 6.25% | 6.26% | 6.40% | 6.11% | 5.44% | 4.09% | 4.80% | 5.21% | 5.93% | 6.47% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFHY and BPH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WFHY.
WFHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
WFHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WFHY and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for WFHY and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer