PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFHY vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFHY vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WFHY

1D
0.05%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.74%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
8.17%
5Y*
3.22%
10Y*
4.96%

BPH

1D
0.38%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFHY vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WFHY and BPH is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFHY vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFHY
WFHY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
WFHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFHY Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WFHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BPH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFHY vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (WFHY) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFHYBPHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

WFHY vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHYBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

9.79

-9.18

Drawdowns

WFHY vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFHY drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFHY and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHYBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-2.35%

-20.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-0.93%

-1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

Volatility

WFHY vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHYBPHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

23.51%

-19.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

23.51%

-15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

23.51%

-15.31%

WFHY vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFHY has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFHY vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

WFHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFHY
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
6.25%6.26%6.40%6.11%5.44%4.09%4.80%5.21%5.93%6.47%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFHY and BPH have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WFHY.

WFHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

WFHY is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WFHY and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFHY and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer