PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFH vs. SHOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFH vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHOC

1D
0.94%
1M
25.12%
YTD
73.38%
6M
70.44%
1Y
149.45%
3Y*
53.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFH vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.00%15.47%18.55%35.75%-9.95%
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
73.38%49.91%16.74%61.97%-1.17%

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and SHOC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between WFH and SHOC has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

WFH vs. SHOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WFH
SHOC

Technology

86.2%
100.0%

Communication Services

9.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%

-

Industrials

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

WFH
86.2%
SHOC
100.0%

Communication Services

WFH
9.4%
SHOC

-

Consumer Cyclical

WFH
2.3%
SHOC

-

Industrials

WFH
2.2%
SHOC

-

Basic Materials

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Consumer Defensive

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Energy

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Financial Services

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Healthcare

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Real Estate

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Utilities

WFH

-

SHOC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFH vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFH

SHOC
SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFH vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WFH vs. SHOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHSHOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

Drawdowns

WFH vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHSHOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

Volatility

WFH vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHSHOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.16%

WFH vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFH vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than SHOC's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
0.14%0.23%0.35%0.65%0.24%0.00%0.00%
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.91%0.94%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFH and SHOC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.

WFH has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.

WFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while SHOC is Semiconductors. WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index, while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.40% for SHOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFH and SHOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer