SHOC vs. XLK
SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SHOC returned 40.54%/yr vs 26.04%/yr for XLK. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SHOC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
SHOC vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 46.90% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 22.09% return.
SHOC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.26%
- YTD
- 46.90%
- 1Y
- 85.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 44.63%
XLK
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- YTD
- 22.09%
- 1Y
- 37.14%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 23.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25M | $1.87M | $2.57M | |
| $1.61B | $1.67B | $2.22B |
SHOC vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 46.90% | 49.91% | 16.74% | 61.97% | -1.79% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.09% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOC and XLK is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between SHOC and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
SHOC vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHOC
XLK
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SHOC
XLK
Basic Materials
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Communication Services
SHOC
-
XLK
Consumer Cyclical
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Consumer Defensive
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Energy
SHOC
-
XLK
Financial Services
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Healthcare
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Industrials
SHOC
-
XLK
Real Estate
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Utilities
SHOC
-
XLK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHOC vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
SHOC
XLK
SHOC vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHOC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 2.16 | +1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 5.85 | +7.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHOC vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -82.05% | +44.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.20% | -15.92% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.54% | -25.66% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | -11.43% | -7.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -34.80% | +27.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 5.86% | +0.25% |
Volatility
SHOC vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 16.48% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 9.58%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHOC | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | 9.58% | +6.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.09% | 21.81% | +12.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.12% | 25.59% | +14.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 25.75% | +11.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 24.90% | +11.97% |
SHOC vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHOC vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XLK's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.45% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, SHOC and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SHOC has higher volatility (16.48%) compared to XLK (9.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOC dropped -37.54% vs XLK's -82.05%.
On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 40.54% vs 26.04% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 40.54% return vs 26.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while XLK is Technology Equities. SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 0.08% for XLK.
SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHOC and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer