WFH vs. CLIP
WFH (Direxion Work From Home ETF) and CLIP (Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WFH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Remote Work Index, while CLIP is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WFH charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CLIP.
Performance
WFH vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WFH
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLIP
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFH vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.00% | 15.47% | 18.55% | 14.62% |
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.52% | 4.23% | 5.26% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFH and CLIP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFH vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank
WFH
CLIP
WFH vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFH | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 17.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 10.71 | — |
Drawdowns
WFH vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFH | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.00% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
WFH vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFH | CLIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.23% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.44% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.44% | — |
WFH vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
WFH vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison
WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIP Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.91% | 4.14% | 5.11% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFH Direxion Work From Home ETF | 0.91% | 0.94% | 0.50% | 0.67% | 0.42% | 0.79% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WFH and CLIP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.
CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.91% for WFH.
WFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index, while CLIP tracks Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.07% for CLIP.
Find the right allocation for WFH and CLIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer