PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFH vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFH vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WFH

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFH vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.00%15.47%18.55%14.62%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.52%4.23%5.26%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between WFH and CLIP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFH vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFH

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFH vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Work From Home ETF (WFH) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WFH vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFHCLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.71

Drawdowns

WFH vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFHCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

WFH vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFHCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.44%

WFH vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

WFH vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

WFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than CLIP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.91%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFH
Direxion Work From Home ETF
0.91%0.94%0.50%0.67%0.42%0.79%0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


WFH and CLIP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WFH.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.91% for WFH.

WFH is categorized as Technology Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. WFH tracks Solactive Remote Work Index, while CLIP tracks Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index - USD. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WFH and 0.07% for CLIP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFH and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer