WFGGX vs. GLIFX
Compare and contrast key facts about WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX).
WFGGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Jun 27, 2013. GLIFX is managed by Lazard.
Performance
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund | -7.73% | 24.09% | 30.71% | 26.13% | -30.75% | 14.62% | 39.10% | 33.46% | -3.53% | 27.31% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 5.89% | 23.85% | 6.71% | 10.89% | -1.33% | 19.91% | -4.51% | 22.27% | -3.82% | 20.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFGGX achieves a -7.73% return, which is significantly lower than GLIFX's 5.89% return. Over the past 10 years, WFGGX has outperformed GLIFX with an annualized return of 13.40%, while GLIFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
WFGGX
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -11.60%
- YTD
- -7.73%
- 6M
- -9.04%
- 1Y
- 17.63%
- 3Y*
- 19.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
GLIFX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 23.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFGGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GLIFX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WFGGX vs. GLIFX — Risk / Return Rank
WFGGX
GLIFX
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WFGGX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 2.23 | -1.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 2.83 | -1.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.74 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 11.44 | -9.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WFGGX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.23 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 1.14 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.75 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.85 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between WFGGX and GLIFX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Dividend Comparison
WFGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than GLIFX's 6.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund | 4.06% | 3.75% | 4.75% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 10.47% | 3.41% | 1.77% | 2.93% | 1.49% | 12.79% | 0.38% |
GLIFX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares | 6.37% | 6.22% | 4.26% | 2.95% | 14.81% | 6.21% | 2.59% | 4.44% | 14.29% | 6.94% | 1.91% | 11.33% |
Drawdowns
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFGGX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, which is greater than GLIFX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFGGX and GLIFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFGGX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.91% | -29.65% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.62% | -9.00% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.91% | -17.15% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.91% | -29.65% | -7.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.62% | -7.05% | -5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -3.35% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.82% | 2.16% | +3.66% |
Volatility
WFGGX vs. GLIFX - Volatility Comparison
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Institutional Shares (GLIFX) at 4.58%. This indicates that WFGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WFGGX | GLIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 4.58% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 7.35% | +6.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.84% | 10.71% | +12.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 10.70% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 13.25% | +5.78% |