WFGGX vs. CAEIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WFGGX (WCM Focused Global Growth Fund) and CAEIX (Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WFGGX returned 15.02%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for CAEIX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WFGGX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CAEIX.

Performance

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFGGX achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than CAEIX's 23.10% return. Over the past 10 years, WFGGX has outperformed CAEIX with an annualized return of 15.02%, while CAEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.83% annualized return.

WFGGX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 8.93%
• 6M: 11.83%
• 1Y: 20.57%
• 3Y*: 25.26%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 15.02%

CAEIX

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 23.10%
• 6M: 23.57%
• 1Y: 49.07%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund	8.93%	24.09%	30.71%	26.13%	-30.75%	14.62%	39.10%	33.46%	-3.53%	27.31%
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	23.10%	32.61%	-7.13%	5.67%	-17.43%	6.73%	61.52%	33.48%	-19.26%	29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between WFGGX and CAEIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2013	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between WFGGX and CAEIX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WFGGX vs. CAEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFGGX

WFGGX Risk / Return Rank: 27
WFGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
WFGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
WFGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
WFGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WFGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

CAEIX

CAEIX Risk / Return Rank: 89
CAEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CAEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CAEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CAEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CAEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) and Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WFGGX	CAEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	3.08	-1.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	3.95	-1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.52	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	6.03	-3.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.79	20.83	-13.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the CAEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFGGX and CAEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WFGGX	CAEIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	3.08	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.34	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.60	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.07	+0.72

Drawdowns

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFGGX drawdown since its inception was -36.91%, smaller than the maximum CAEIX drawdown of -75.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFGGX and CAEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WFGGX	CAEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.91%	-75.81%	+38.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.62%	-8.39%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.15%	-24.57%	+4.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.91%	-32.58%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.91%	-37.54%	+0.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	0.00%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.79%	-48.64%	+41.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.42%	+1.04%

Volatility

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WCM Focused Global Growth Fund (WFGGX) is 4.33%, while Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that WFGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WFGGX	CAEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	5.76%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.94%	12.91%	+2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.52%	16.43%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.25%	19.18%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.14%	19.69%	-0.55%

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFGGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CAEIX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WFGGX vs. CAEIX - Dividend Comparison

WFGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than CAEIX's 0.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund	0.59%	0.72%	1.17%	1.07%	0.86%	0.49%	0.82%	1.23%	2.00%	1.40%	1.79%	0.72%
WFGGX WCM Focused Global Growth Fund	3.44%	3.75%	4.75%	0.00%	3.58%	10.47%	3.41%	1.77%	2.93%	1.49%	12.79%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WFGGX and CAEIX in my portfolio?

WFGGX and CAEIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WFGGX or CAEIX?

CAEIX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to WFGGX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFGGX dropped -36.91% vs CAEIX's -75.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CAEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.