PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFG.TO vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WFG.TO is traded in CAD, while AAPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AAPL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFG.TO achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 17.16% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG.TO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 9.47%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 31.22% annualized return.


WFG.TO

1D
1.78%
1M
16.52%
YTD
12.98%
6M
10.28%
1Y
-4.53%
3Y*
1.43%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
9.47%

AAPL

1D
0.00%
1M
15.77%
YTD
17.16%
6M
10.26%
1Y
57.05%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
24.12%
10Y*
31.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFG.TO
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
12.98%-31.32%11.51%17.78%-17.80%49.33%45.06%-13.91%-12.27%62.43%
AAPL
Apple Inc
15.79%4.05%41.93%45.73%-21.16%33.43%79.23%79.67%2.63%39.01%

Correlation

The correlation between WFG.TO and AAPL is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.17

The correlation between WFG.TO and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WFG.TO:

CA$7.39B

AAPL:

$4.58T

EPS

WFG.TO:

-CA$18.32

AAPL:

$8.24

PS Ratio

WFG.TO:

1.29

AAPL:

10.23

PB Ratio

WFG.TO:

1.31

AAPL:

43.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

WFG.TO:

CA$5.74B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WFG.TO:

CA$572.85M

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

WFG.TO:

-CA$1.02B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFG.TO vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFG.TO
WFG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
WFG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFG.TOAAPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

2.56

-2.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

3.56

-3.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.46

-0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

3.82

-4.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.34

9.03

-9.37

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFG.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFG.TO and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFG.TOAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.56

-2.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.92

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

1.13

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

1.15

-0.91

Drawdowns

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFG.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG.TO and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFG.TOAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.19%

-40.80%

-35.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.21%

-15.00%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.57%

-34.02%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.57%

-34.02%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.19%

-36.10%

-40.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.32%

0.00%

-30.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.47%

-8.85%

-13.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.55%

6.33%

+7.22%

Volatility

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 4.94%. This indicates that WFG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFG.TOAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

4.94%

+4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.41%

16.24%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.61%

22.43%

+9.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.76%

26.36%

+5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.20%

27.80%

+10.40%

Dividends

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

WFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
WFG.TO
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
1.86%2.12%1.39%1.42%1.55%0.96%0.98%1.40%1.04%0.46%0.58%0.53%

Financials

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
1.31B
111.18B
(WFG.TO) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WFG.TO values in CAD, AAPL values in USD

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
1.3%
49.3%
Portfolio components
WFG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 16.72M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.3%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

WFG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of -206.56M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of -15.7%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

WFG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a net income of -184.92M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of -14.1%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WFG.TO and AAPL have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFG.TO and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer