PortfoliosLab logo
WFG.TO vs. AAPL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between WFG.TO and AAPL is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20,000.00%40,000.00%60,000.00%80,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1,737.15%
60,147.10%
WFG.TO
AAPL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WFG.TO:

-0.14

AAPL:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

WFG.TO:

0.16

AAPL:

0.63

Omega Ratio

WFG.TO:

1.02

AAPL:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

WFG.TO:

-0.03

AAPL:

0.28

Martin Ratio

WFG.TO:

-0.06

AAPL:

0.95

Ulcer Index

WFG.TO:

12.07%

AAPL:

9.69%

Daily Std Dev

WFG.TO:

26.97%

AAPL:

32.34%

Max Drawdown

WFG.TO:

-76.19%

AAPL:

-81.80%

Current Drawdown

WFG.TO:

-24.73%

AAPL:

-23.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WFG.TO:

CA$8.14B

AAPL:

$2.97T

EPS

WFG.TO:

-CA$0.04

AAPL:

$6.43

PS Ratio

WFG.TO:

1.35

AAPL:

7.66

PB Ratio

WFG.TO:

0.85

AAPL:

45.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

WFG.TO:

CA$6.01B

AAPL:

$400.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WFG.TO:

CA$1.81B

AAPL:

$186.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

WFG.TO:

CA$286.00M

AAPL:

$138.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFG.TO achieves a -16.19% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -21.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG.TO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 6.01%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 21.49% annualized return.


WFG.TO

YTD

-16.19%

1M

2.83%

6M

-18.20%

1Y

-3.65%

5Y*

22.83%

10Y*

6.01%

AAPL

YTD

-21.05%

1M

14.54%

6M

-12.99%

1Y

8.58%

5Y*

21.29%

10Y*

21.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

WFG.TO vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFG.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WFG.TO is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WFG.TO is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WFG.TO is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WFG.TO is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WFG.TO is 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WFG.TO is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AAPL is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AAPL is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AAPL is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current WFG.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFG.TO and AAPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.18
0.26
WFG.TO
AAPL

Dividends

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

WFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than AAPL's 0.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
WFG.TO
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd.
1.72%1.39%1.42%1.55%0.96%0.98%1.40%1.04%0.46%0.58%0.53%0.42%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.51%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%1.67%

Drawdowns

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFG.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG.TO and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-25.67%
-23.67%
WFG.TO
AAPL

Volatility

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) is 9.03%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 17.85%. This indicates that WFG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.03%
17.85%
WFG.TO
AAPL

Financials

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20212022202320242025
1.46B
95.36B
(WFG.TO) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WFG.TO values in CAD, AAPL values in USD

WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
32.8%
47.1%
(WFG.TO) Gross Margin
(AAPL) Gross Margin
WFG.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a gross profit of 478.00M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 44.87B and revenue of 95.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.1%.

WFG.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported an operating income of 64.00M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 29.59B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

WFG.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. reported a net income of 42.00M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Apple Inc reported a net income of 24.78B and revenue of 95.36B, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.