WFG.TO vs. AAPL
Compare and contrast key facts about West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WFG.TO or AAPL.
Correlation
The correlation between WFG.TO and AAPL is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WFG.TO:
0.27
AAPL:
1.17
WFG.TO:
0.59
AAPL:
1.77
WFG.TO:
1.07
AAPL:
1.22
WFG.TO:
0.34
AAPL:
1.60
WFG.TO:
0.92
AAPL:
4.14
WFG.TO:
7.48%
AAPL:
6.40%
WFG.TO:
26.06%
AAPL:
22.65%
WFG.TO:
-76.19%
AAPL:
-81.80%
WFG.TO:
-11.96%
AAPL:
-9.51%
Fundamentals
WFG.TO:
CA$9.83B
AAPL:
$3.67T
WFG.TO:
-CA$1.65
AAPL:
$6.08
WFG.TO:
CA$3.33B
AAPL:
$271.46B
WFG.TO:
CA$1.08B
AAPL:
$125.83B
WFG.TO:
CA$497.00M
AAPL:
$91.44B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFG.TO achieves a -1.61% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's -6.40% return. Over the past 10 years, WFG.TO has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 8.36%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 25.90% annualized return.
WFG.TO
-1.61%
-3.79%
18.12%
7.44%
18.03%
8.36%
AAPL
-6.40%
-5.53%
0.23%
26.69%
25.56%
25.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WFG.TO vs. AAPL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WFG.TO
AAPL
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
WFG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than AAPL's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFG.TO West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. | 0.77% | 0.75% | 1.06% | 1.18% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.40% | 1.04% | 0.46% | 0.58% | 0.53% | 0.42% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.42% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFG.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFG.TO and AAPL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. (WFG.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.76%. This indicates that WFG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
WFG.TO vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between West Fraser Timber Co. Ltd. and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities