PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFC vs. SKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WFC vs. SKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WFC

1D
1.61%
1M
14.04%
YTD
-9.20%
6M
-8.77%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
28.38%
5Y*
15.64%
10Y*
8.95%

SKX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFC vs. SKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
-9.20%35.57%46.48%22.94%-11.92%61.15%-41.65%21.44%-21.83%13.21%
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%-6.11%7.86%48.61%-3.34%20.76%-16.79%88.69%-39.51%53.95%

Correlation

The correlation between WFC and SKX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 1999

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between WFC and SKX has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WFC:

$269.39B

SKX:

$9.55B

EPS

WFC:

$6.73

SKX:

$4.40

PE Ratio

WFC:

12.44

SKX:

14.35

PEG Ratio

WFC:

1.07

SKX:

0.09

PS Ratio

WFC:

2.15

SKX:

1.01

PB Ratio

WFC:

1.65

SKX:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

WFC:

$125.70B

SKX:

$9.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WFC:

$81.14B

SKX:

$4.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

WFC:

$31.58B

SKX:

$1.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFC vs. SKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFC
WFC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFC vs. SKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. (SKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WFCSKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.54

WFC vs. SKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WFC vs. SKX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFCSKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.18%

Volatility

WFC vs. SKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFCSKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.28%

Dividends

WFC vs. SKX - Dividend Comparison

WFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, while SKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SKX
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WFC
Wells Fargo & Company
2.15%1.82%2.14%2.64%2.66%1.25%4.04%3.57%3.56%2.54%2.75%2.71%

Financials

WFC vs. SKX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wells Fargo & Company and Skechers U.S.A., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
31.80B
2.44B
(WFC) Total Revenue
(SKX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WFC vs. SKX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wells Fargo & Company and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
63.9%
53.3%
Portfolio components
WFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a gross profit of 20.31B and revenue of 31.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.

SKX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.30B and revenue of 2.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.3%.

WFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported an operating income of 5.85B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

SKX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported an operating income of 173.08M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

WFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wells Fargo & Company reported a net income of 5.29B and revenue of 31.80B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

SKX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Skechers U.S.A., Inc. reported a net income of 170.50M and revenue of 2.44B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WFC and SKX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFC and SKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer