PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFBIX vs. BFFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFBIX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than BFFAX's 0.15% return.


WFBIX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.54%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
5.29%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
1.96%

BFFAX

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.53%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.32%7.16%1.43%9.65%-13.03%-1.79%7.40%8.72%-0.08%3.31%
BFFAX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3
0.15%7.54%1.54%4.39%-13.00%-0.97%11.12%8.17%0.22%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between WFBIX and BFFAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.93

The correlation between WFBIX and BFFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFBIX vs. BFFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFBIX
WFBIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
WFBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
WFBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BFFAX
BFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) and American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFBIXBFFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.52

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.59

4.50

+0.09

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the BFFAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFBIX and BFFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFBIXBFFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.19

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.00

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.43

+0.51

Drawdowns

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFBIX drawdown since its inception was -18.68%, which is greater than BFFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFBIX and BFFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WFBIXBFFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.68%

-17.74%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-3.08%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-6.10%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.84%

-17.74%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.65%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-4.69%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.04%

-0.02%

Volatility

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) is 1.31%, while American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that WFBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BFFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WFBIXBFFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

1.38%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.84%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

3.97%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

5.96%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.17%

4.99%

+0.18%

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WFBIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BFFAX's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WFBIX vs. BFFAX - Dividend Comparison

WFBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than BFFAX's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFFAX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3
4.50%4.48%4.67%3.28%2.46%1.98%5.38%3.80%2.72%2.01%0.00%0.00%
WFBIX
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund
3.91%3.78%3.68%6.82%2.60%2.04%2.43%2.88%2.71%2.24%2.25%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, WFBIX and BFFAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BFFAX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to WFBIX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WFBIX dropped -18.68% vs BFFAX's -17.74%.

BFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WFBIX and BFFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer