PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WESRX vs. LOCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WESRX achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly lower than LOCFX's 18.67% return.


WESRX

1D
-1.04%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
17.14%
6M
14.90%
1Y
31.97%
3Y*
15.85%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
9.85%

LOCFX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
18.67%
6M
16.65%
1Y
33.78%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
6.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WESRX
TETON Convertible Securities Fund
17.14%17.20%11.73%5.09%-21.96%2.21%27.22%24.42%-0.80%11.11%
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
18.67%22.43%14.00%7.30%-23.12%1.40%64.47%25.07%-6.42%10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between WESRX and LOCFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2017

0.86

The correlation between WESRX and LOCFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WESRX vs. LOCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WESRX
WESRX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
WESRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WESRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WESRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
WESRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
WESRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LOCFX
LOCFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
LOCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LOCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX) and Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WESRXLOCFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.80

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

16.58

-8.73

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WESRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the LOCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WESRX and LOCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WESRX drawdown since its inception was -51.81%, which is greater than LOCFX's maximum drawdown of -33.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WESRX and LOCFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WESRXLOCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.81%

-33.29%

-18.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.95%

-7.02%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

-12.09%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.66%

-30.60%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.49%

-3.09%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.07%

-11.15%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

2.03%

+2.02%

Volatility

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Volatility Comparison

TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX) has a higher volatility of 6.48% compared to Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3 (LOCFX) at 6.14%. This indicates that WESRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WESRXLOCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

6.14%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.06%

12.97%

+1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

15.74%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

13.19%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.62%

14.09%

-0.47%

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WESRX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LOCFX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

WESRX vs. LOCFX - Dividend Comparison

WESRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than LOCFX's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOCFX
Lord Abbett Convertible Fund Class F3
1.00%1.86%2.29%2.06%2.72%18.36%16.20%8.75%5.02%2.08%0.00%0.00%
WESRX
TETON Convertible Securities Fund
6.97%8.95%2.87%2.63%11.45%10.69%3.13%2.75%5.87%1.95%5.10%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WESRX and LOCFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WESRX has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to LOCFX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WESRX dropped -51.81% vs LOCFX's -33.29%.

LOCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WESRX and LOCFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer