WENS.L vs. VDPG.L
WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and VDPG.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WENS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VDPG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WENS.L returned 15.52%/yr vs 24.13%/yr for VDPG.L. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WENS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VDPG.L.
Performance
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WENS.L achieves a 31.68% return, which is significantly lower than VDPG.L's 47.65% return.
WENS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 31.68%
- 6M
- 31.58%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDPG.L
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 47.65%
- 6M
- 52.89%
- 1Y
- 79.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 31.68% | 6.73% | 3.85% | -2.00% | 17.73% |
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 47.65% | 30.58% | -3.06% | 4.10% | 3.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between WENS.L and VDPG.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.25 |
The correlation between WENS.L and VDPG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L — Risk / Return Rank
WENS.L
VDPG.L
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WENS.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.65 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 5.87 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 20.42 | -11.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -21.15%, smaller than the maximum VDPG.L drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and VDPG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WENS.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.15% | -40.69% | +19.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -13.45% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.15% | -26.18% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -4.74% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -11.24% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 3.87% | +0.72% |
Volatility
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) is 6.58%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc (VDPG.L) has a volatility of 11.04%. This indicates that WENS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WENS.L | VDPG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.58% | 11.04% | -4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.29% | 19.69% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.38% | 21.82% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 21.25% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 23.27% | -1.81% |
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WENS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VDPG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WENS.L vs. VDPG.L - Dividend Comparison
WENS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, while VDPG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDPG.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.28% | 3.25% | 3.52% | 3.61% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WENS.L and VDPG.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VDPG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VDPG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.
WENS.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while VDPG.L is Asia Pacific Equities. WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VDPG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WENS.L and 0.15% for VDPG.L.
Find the right allocation for WENS.L and VDPG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer