PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WENS.L vs. IGLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WENS.L is traded in GBP, while IGLN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WENS.L achieves a 31.38% return, which is significantly higher than IGLN.L's 4.12% return.


WENS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
31.38%
6M
26.68%
1Y
44.00%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*

IGLN.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
4.12%
6M
5.29%
1Y
33.65%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.38%3.24%2.09%-2.00%17.73%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
4.12%53.17%28.35%7.77%1.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WENS.L and IGLN.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.04

The correlation between WENS.L and IGLN.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WENS.LIGLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.91

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

5.10

+4.57

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WENS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WENS.L and IGLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WENS.LIGLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.39

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Drawdowns

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WENS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.49%, smaller than the maximum IGLN.L drawdown of -41.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WENS.L and IGLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WENS.LIGLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-41.86%

+19.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.63%

-17.53%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.49%

-17.53%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.62%

-15.75%

+8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-14.94%

+5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

6.59%

-2.05%

Volatility

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) at 5.91%. This indicates that WENS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WENS.LIGLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

5.91%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.19%

21.10%

-2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

24.06%

-2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

16.80%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

16.34%

+5.15%

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WENS.L and IGLN.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

WENS.L vs. IGLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WENS.L nor IGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


WENS.L and IGLN.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WENS.L and IGLN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

WENS.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while IGLN.L is Gold. WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WENS.L and IGLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer