WEMMX vs. WHGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX).
WEMMX is managed by Teton Westwood. It was launched on May 11, 1998. WHGSX is managed by Westwood. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007.
Performance
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 4.76% | 11.02% | 3.83% | 13.53% | -15.37% | 21.44% | 10.02% | 16.94% | -13.69% | 15.47% |
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 1.83% | -0.12% | 4.75% | 17.16% | -12.42% | 27.94% | 2.16% | 27.13% | -14.25% | 12.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEMMX achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than WHGSX's 1.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WEMMX having a 8.17% annualized return and WHGSX not far ahead at 8.40%.
WEMMX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
WHGSX
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 8.97%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEMMX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is higher than WHGSX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WEMMX vs. WHGSX — Risk / Return Rank
WEMMX
WHGSX
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) and Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEMMX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.46 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.80 | 0.78 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.63 | +1.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 1.96 | +4.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEMMX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.46 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.18 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.38 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.28 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between WEMMX and WHGSX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Dividend Comparison
WEMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than WHGSX's 6.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEMMX TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund | 21.77% | 22.80% | 26.79% | 18.86% | 13.60% | 15.44% | 9.23% | 4.11% | 4.16% | 6.44% | 4.61% | 2.35% |
WHGSX Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund | 6.00% | 6.11% | 6.37% | 4.06% | 3.67% | 4.69% | 0.65% | 1.04% | 7.20% | 7.25% | 0.52% | 0.41% |
Drawdowns
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEMMX drawdown since its inception was -42.48%, smaller than the maximum WHGSX drawdown of -56.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEMMX and WHGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEMMX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.48% | -56.51% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -14.68% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.11% | -26.67% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.73% | -42.94% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.04% | -8.51% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -10.53% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 4.73% | -1.13% |
Volatility
WEMMX vs. WHGSX - Volatility Comparison
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites Fund (WEMMX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund (WHGSX) at 5.18%. This indicates that WEMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WHGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WEMMX | WHGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 5.18% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.24% | 12.07% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.00% | 20.16% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 20.14% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 22.05% | -1.69% |