WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE
WELT.DE (Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist) and XDWM.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C) are both Industrials Equities funds - WELT.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials while XDWM.DE tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELT.DE returned 17.33%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for XDWM.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WELT.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWM.DE.
Performance
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with WELT.DE having a 15.23% return and XDWM.DE slightly higher at 15.62%.
WELT.DE
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWM.DE
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 15.62%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.70%
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELT.DE Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 15.23% | 10.22% | 16.35% | 19.85% | 7.82% |
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 15.62% | 12.88% | 0.02% | 10.77% | 5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELT.DE and XDWM.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.72 |
The correlation between WELT.DE and XDWM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELT.DE
XDWM.DE
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELT.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.17 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | 8.91 | +0.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELT.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 1.70 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.62 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELT.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.81%, smaller than the maximum XDWM.DE drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELT.DE and XDWM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELT.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.81% | -33.91% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -13.67% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.81% | -20.77% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -2.14% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -5.48% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.34% | -0.76% |
Volatility
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELT.DE) is 3.88%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.DE) has a volatility of 6.55%. This indicates that WELT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELT.DE | XDWM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 6.55% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.34% | 15.21% | -2.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 17.45% | -2.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 16.81% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.32% | 17.58% | -2.26% |
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELT.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WELT.DE vs. XDWM.DE - Dividend Comparison
WELT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while XDWM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WELT.DE Amundi S&P Global Industrials ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist | 1.12% | 1.29% | 1.36% | 1.04% |
XDWM.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WELT.DE and XDWM.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELT.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELT.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWM.DE.
WELT.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Industrials, while XDWM.DE tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELT.DE and 0.25% for XDWM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELT.DE and XDWM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer