PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WELL vs. GDXU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WELL vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Welltower Inc. (WELL) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WELL achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -56.00% return.


WELL

1D
1.69%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
16.22%
6M
15.53%
1Y
43.19%
3Y*
40.64%
5Y*
24.91%
10Y*
15.50%

GDXU

1D
8.84%
1M
-50.11%
YTD
-56.00%
6M
-55.92%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
37.87%
5Y*
-14.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELL vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WELL
Welltower Inc.
16.22%49.86%43.07%41.79%-21.18%36.98%3.43%
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
-56.00%796.47%-18.60%-21.36%-62.82%-54.93%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between WELL and GDXU is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

0.22

The correlation between WELL and GDXU shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WELL vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELL
WELL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELL Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXU
GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELL vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Welltower Inc. (WELL) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WELLGDXUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.37

+3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

0.80

+7.66

WELL vs. GDXU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WELL Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the GDXU Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WELL and GDXU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WELL vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELL drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELL and GDXU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WELLGDXUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.33%

-94.39%

+31.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.61%

-83.97%

+71.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-83.97%

+70.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.78%

-92.44%

+51.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-79.58%

+76.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-69.77%

+59.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

38.59%

-33.48%

Volatility

WELL vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Welltower Inc. (WELL) is 9.54%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a volatility of 54.28%. This indicates that WELL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WELLGDXUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

54.28%

-44.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

123.72%

-106.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.65%

142.00%

-120.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

111.92%

-88.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.90%

110.82%

-78.92%

Dividends

WELL vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison

WELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXU
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WELL
Welltower Inc.
1.38%1.52%2.03%2.71%3.72%2.84%4.18%4.26%5.01%5.46%5.14%4.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


WELL and GDXU have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to WELL (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WELL dropped -63.33% vs GDXU's -94.39%.

WELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WELL and GDXU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer