WELD vs. CANC

Last updated Jun 28, 2026

WELD (Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF) and CANC (Tema Oncology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WELD is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while CANC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

WELD vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF (WELD) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WELD

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CANC

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: 5.23%
• YTD: 16.09%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 60.75%
• 3Y*: 140.43%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WELD vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WELD Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF	-5.19%
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between WELD and CANC is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2026	-0.70

Return for Risk

WELD vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WELD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CANC

CANC Risk / Return Rank: 91
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WELD vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF (WELD) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WELD	CANC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.44	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.24	—

Drawdowns

WELD vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WELD drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELD and CANC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WELD	CANC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	-97.53%	+91.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.30%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.19%	-51.87%	+46.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.46%	-72.89%	+68.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WELD	CANC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.93%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.79%	22.60%	+24.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.79%	278.30%	-231.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.79%	278.30%	-231.51%

WELD vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WELD and CANC have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

WELD vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

WELD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CANC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CANC Tema Oncology ETF	0.05%	0.06%	3.00%	0.56%
WELD Tema U.S. Manufacturing & Reshoring ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WELD and CANC in my portfolio?

WELD and CANC have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WELD or CANC?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WELD or CANC?

WELD and CANC have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WELD or CANC?

CANC has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for WELD.

What is the main difference between WELD and CANC?

WELD is categorized as Industrials Equities, while CANC is Health & Biotech Equities.