WEEL vs. CONY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WEEL (Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WEEL returned 16.25% vs -49.35% for CONY. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

WEEL vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEL achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -31.56% return.

WEEL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 5.52%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 1Y: 16.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

CONY

• 1D: -9.82%
• 1M: -8.17%
• 6M: -20.90%
• YTD: -31.56%
• 1Y: -49.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	$6.79M	$6.47M	$10.17M
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	$406.88K	$319.91K	$357.06K

WEEL vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	6.19%	17.73%	3.10%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-31.56%	-26.34%	5.85%

Correlation

The correlation between WEEL and CONY is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2024	0.53

The correlation between WEEL and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WEEL vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WEEL

WEEL Risk / Return Rank: 84
WEEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
WEEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
WEEL Omega Ratio Rank: 82
WEEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
WEEL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 1
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WEEL vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEEL	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	-0.97	+2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	-1.54	+4.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	0.82	+0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	-0.97	+4.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.04	-1.49	+16.53

WEEL vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEL Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEL and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEEL vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEL drawdown since its inception was -17.45%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEL and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEEL	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.45%	-63.57%	+46.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-59.52%	+54.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-61.23%	+60.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-24.13%	+22.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	39.88%	-38.86%

Volatility

WEEL vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF (WEEL) is 2.91%, while YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that WEEL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEEL	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.91%	16.98%	-14.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	46.95%	-40.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.59%	59.51%	-50.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.65%	59.91%	-47.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.65%	59.91%	-47.26%

WEEL vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WEEL and CONY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

WEEL vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

WEEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, less than CONY's 171.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	171.52%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
WEEL Peerless Option Income Wheel ETF	12.72%	12.72%	6.88%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEEL and CONY in my portfolio?

WEEL and CONY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEEL or CONY?

CONY has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to WEEL (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEL dropped -17.45% vs CONY's -63.57%.

Which ETF is better, WEEL or CONY?

On 1-year performance, WEEL leads with 16.25% vs -49.35% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, WEEL has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEEL or CONY?

Over the 1-year period, WEEL has performed better with a 16.25% return vs -49.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEEL or CONY?

WEEL and CONY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEEL or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 171.52%, compared with 12.72% for WEEL.

What is the main difference between WEEL and CONY?

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and YieldMax.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.