PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEEK vs. LFGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEEK vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEEK achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 14.39% return.


WEEK

1D
0.04%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.79%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LFGY

1D
4.44%
1M
-3.09%
YTD
14.39%
6M
4.19%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEEK vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WEEK and LFGY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEEK vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEEK
WEEK Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
WEEK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEEK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEEK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WEEK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEEK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LFGY
LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEEK vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEEKLFGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+18.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.63

1.05

+3.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

29.58

0.14

+29.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

264.43

0.30

+264.14

WEEK vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEEK Sharpe Ratio is 9.29, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEEK and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEEKLFGYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29

0.13

+9.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

10.10

0.09

+10.01

Drawdowns

WEEK vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEEK drawdown since its inception was -0.13%, smaller than the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEEK and LFGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEEKLFGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.13%

-35.94%

+35.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.13%

-35.94%

+35.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.62%

+12.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-14.06%

+14.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

16.48%

-16.47%

Volatility

WEEK vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF (WEEK) is 0.08%, while YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a volatility of 12.43%. This indicates that WEEK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEEKLFGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.08%

12.43%

-12.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.25%

31.17%

-30.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41%

37.80%

-37.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

42.36%

-41.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.39%

42.36%

-41.97%

WEEK vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEEK has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEEK vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

WEEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than LFGY's 82.87% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


WEEK and LFGY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFGY has higher volatility (12.43%) compared to WEEK (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEEK dropped -0.13% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

On 1-year performance, LFGY leads with 4.87% vs 3.83% for WEEK. On fees, WEEK is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, WEEK has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LFGY has performed better with a 4.87% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEEK is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LFGY.

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 82.87%, compared with 3.72% for WEEK.

WEEK is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while LFGY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for WEEK and 0.99% for LFGY.

WEEK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.29 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEEK and LFGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer