WEED vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

WEED (Roundhill Cannabis ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEED is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WEED returned -5.00%/yr vs 28.89%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEED charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

WEED vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEED achieves a -2.97% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -4.97% return.

WEED

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: -2.97%
• 6M: -5.16%
• 1Y: 111.18%
• 3Y*: -5.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -9.63%
• YTD: -4.97%
• 6M: -6.70%
• 1Y: 17.13%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEED vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WEED Roundhill Cannabis ETF	-2.97%	19.40%	-44.93%	43.60%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-4.97%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WEED and MAGS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.14

WEED vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WEED	MAGS
Healthcare	60.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	17.3%	-
Real Estate	16.3%	-
Technology	6.3%	8.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	5.3%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WEED vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEED

WEED Risk / Return Rank: 40
WEED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
WEED Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WEED Omega Ratio Rank: 44
WEED Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
WEED Martin Ratio Rank: 29

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 24
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 23
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEED vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEED	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.83	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	1.24	+0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.15	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	0.92	+1.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	3.01	+0.80

WEED vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEED Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEED and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEED vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEED drawdown since its inception was -88.37%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEED and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEED	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.37%	-29.91%	-58.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.01%	-18.62%	-35.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.50%	-29.91%	-51.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.03%	-11.64%	-63.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.69%	-4.76%	-58.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.30%	5.70%	+23.60%

Volatility

WEED vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Cannabis ETF (WEED) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 7.13%. This indicates that WEED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEED	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.52%	7.13%	+14.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.47%	15.50%	+41.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	113.50%	20.67%	+92.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.47%	26.01%	+56.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.47%	26.01%	+56.46%

WEED vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEED has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEED vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

WEED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.56%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
WEED Roundhill Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEED and MAGS in my portfolio?

WEED and MAGS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEED or MAGS?

WEED has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to MAGS (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEED dropped -88.37% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, WEED or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 28.89% vs -5.00% for WEED. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEED or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 28.89% return vs -5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEED or MAGS?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WEED.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEED or MAGS?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 0.00% for WEED.

What is the main difference between WEED and MAGS?

WEED is categorized as Cannabis, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WEED and 0.29% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WEED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.