WEBS vs. WTIU
WEBS (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WEBS tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while WTIU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WEBS returned -49.50%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for WTIU. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. WEBS charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
WEBS vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a -17.52% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 87.83% return.
WEBS
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -14.10%
- YTD
- -17.52%
- 6M
- -14.99%
- 1Y
- -29.15%
- 3Y*
- -49.50%
- 5Y*
- -36.81%
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -8.81%
- YTD
- 87.83%
- 6M
- 63.25%
- 1Y
- 112.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEBS vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | -17.52% | -40.66% | -56.62% | -54.48% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 87.83% | -17.13% | -29.63% | -28.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBS and WTIU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | -0.07 |
The correlation between WEBS and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBS vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
WEBS
WTIU
WEBS vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEBS | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | 2.89 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 7.08 | -8.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEBS | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 1.68 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.10 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
WEBS vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBS | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.63% | -75.73% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.54% | -39.11% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.33% | -75.73% | -14.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.60% | -33.42% | -66.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.10% | -39.18% | -51.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.38% | 15.92% | +7.46% |
Volatility
WEBS vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) is 15.71%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 27.11%. This indicates that WEBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBS | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.71% | 27.11% | -11.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.40% | 54.96% | -11.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.59% | 67.43% | -9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.78% | 70.58% | +11.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 89.82% | 70.58% | +19.24% |
WEBS vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBS vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBS Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares | 3.96% | 3.77% | 8.02% | 8.51% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 1.11% | 0.11% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBS and WTIU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (27.11%) compared to WEBS (15.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 3-year performance, WTIU leads with 5.95% vs -49.50% for WEBS. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEBS has been the lower-risk option at 15.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WTIU has performed better with a 5.95% return vs -49.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for WEBS.
WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
WEBS tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 0.95% for WTIU.
WTIU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBS and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer