PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBS vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBS vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBS achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -35.52% return.


WEBS

1D
4.12%
1M
20.33%
YTD
8.23%
6M
12.06%
1Y
-3.46%
3Y*
-45.46%
5Y*
-30.51%
10Y*

NUGT

1D
3.02%
1M
-29.37%
YTD
-35.52%
6M
-41.56%
1Y
59.76%
3Y*
52.08%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
-12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBS vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
8.23%-40.66%-56.62%-75.58%117.15%-39.82%-87.18%-10.90%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-35.52%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%21.94%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBS and NUGT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBS vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBS
WEBS Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WEBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBS Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBS vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBSNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.18

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.06

0.95

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

2.21

-2.37

WEBS vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBS and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBS vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBS drawdown since its inception was -99.63%, roughly equal to the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBS and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBSNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.63%

-99.97%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.54%

-63.43%

+9.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.33%

-63.43%

-26.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.09%

-73.72%

-23.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.48%

-99.85%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.11%

-91.53%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.78%

27.10%

-4.32%

Volatility

WEBS vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares (WEBS) is 22.31%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) has a volatility of 34.79%. This indicates that WEBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBSNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.31%

34.79%

-12.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.50%

80.31%

-33.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.59%

94.54%

-34.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.14%

73.03%

+9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

89.73%

87.98%

+1.75%

WEBS vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

WEBS vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

WEBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than NUGT's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.61%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%
WEBS
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bear 3X Shares
2.53%3.77%8.02%8.51%0.20%0.00%1.11%0.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBS and NUGT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUGT has higher volatility (34.79%) compared to WEBS (22.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBS dropped -99.63% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 5-year performance, NUGT leads with 15.88% vs -30.51% for WEBS. On fees, WEBS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, WEBS has been the lower-risk option at 22.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 15.88% return vs -30.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WEBS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

WEBS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.61% for NUGT.

WEBS is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. WEBS tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while NUGT tracks MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for WEBS and 1.13% for NUGT.

NUGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBS and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer