PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBNF vs. FWRA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBNF achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than FWRA.L's 10.70% return.


WEBNF

1D
0.00%
1M
2.04%
6M
2.12%
YTD
1.39%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
27.01%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
14.22%

FWRA.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.54%
6M
8.51%
YTD
10.70%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
18.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WEBNF
Westpac Banking Corp
1.39%39.75%34.48%12.69%
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
10.70%22.42%18.04%10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBNF and FWRA.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBNF
WEBNF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WEBNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBNF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBNF Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WEBNFFWRA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

2.66

-1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.69

10.60

-8.91

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBNF Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBNF and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBNF drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBNF and FWRA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBNFFWRA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-16.50%

-50.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-8.78%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-16.50%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.58%

-1.48%

-15.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.01%

-1.92%

-19.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.38%

2.20%

+7.18%

Volatility

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

Westpac Banking Corp (WEBNF) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that WEBNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WEBNFFWRA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.30%

3.54%

+9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.33%

10.62%

+22.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.34%

12.91%

+35.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.67%

13.62%

+28.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.17%

13.62%

+25.55%

Dividends

WEBNF vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEBNF nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WEBNF
Westpac Banking Corp
0.00%2.78%8.39%8.91%7.82%42.62%3.83%14.51%19.31%16.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


WEBNF and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WEBNF and FWRA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer