WEBL vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. WEBL is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, WEBL returned -17.16% vs 1964.55% for INTW. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

WEBL vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -21.23% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 750.22% return.

WEBL

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: -17.85%
• YTD: -21.23%
• 6M: -23.52%
• 1Y: -17.16%
• 3Y*: 26.17%
• 5Y*: -23.96%
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: -12.49%
• 1M: 12.21%
• YTD: 750.22%
• 6M: 775.58%
• 1Y: 1,964.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEBL vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	-21.23%	-17.31%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	750.22%	60.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WEBL and INTW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	0.29

WEBL vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WEBL	INTW
Technology	43.1%	66.7%
Communication Services	27.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	25.5%	-
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Industrials	1.3%	-
Healthcare	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WEBL vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBL

WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 7
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 98
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 94
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBL vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEBL	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	13.25	-13.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.03	5.13	-5.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.65	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	40.32	-40.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	91.49	-92.13

WEBL vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 13.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBL and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEBL vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEBL	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.44%	-60.58%	-33.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.57%	-49.34%	-7.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.81%	-12.49%	-64.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.96%	-29.66%	-29.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.95%	21.70%	+5.25%

Volatility

WEBL vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 22.71%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 55.81%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEBL	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.71%	55.81%	-33.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.69%	119.10%	-72.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.90%	150.14%	-91.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.00%	148.88%	-67.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	82.85%	148.88%	-66.03%

WEBL vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEBL vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while INTW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares	0.25%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.79%	0.00%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEBL and INTW in my portfolio?

WEBL and INTW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEBL or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (55.81%) compared to WEBL (22.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, WEBL or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1964.55% vs -17.16% for WEBL. On fees, WEBL is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 22.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEBL or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1964.55% return vs -17.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEBL or INTW?

WEBL is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEBL or INTW?

WEBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for INTW.

What is the main difference between WEBL and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.