WEBL vs. DDM
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while DDM tracks the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -16.60%/yr vs 12.66%/yr for DDM. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DDM.
Performance
WEBL vs. DDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than DDM's 12.97% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- YTD
- 2.87%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 36.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- —
DDM
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 26.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 19.74%
WEBL vs. DDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 2.87% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 13.47% |
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 12.97% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 6.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and DDM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between WEBL and DDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
WEBL vs. DDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
DDM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
WEBL
DDM
Communication Services
WEBL
DDM
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
DDM
Financial Services
WEBL
DDM
Industrials
WEBL
DDM
Healthcare
WEBL
DDM
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
DDM
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
DDM
Energy
WEBL
-
DDM
Real Estate
WEBL
-
DDM
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
DDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. DDM — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
DDM
WEBL vs. DDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEBL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.29 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.18 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 8.00 | -7.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEBL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 1.72 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.43 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.40 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. DDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than DDM's maximum drawdown of -81.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and DDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -81.70% | -12.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -19.31% | -37.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -31.62% | -29.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -40.18% | -54.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.72% | 0.00% | -69.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -17.33% | -41.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.01% | 5.25% | +20.76% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. DDM - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a higher volatility of 15.48% compared to ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) at 6.57%. This indicates that WEBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | DDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.48% | 6.57% | +8.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.37% | 18.87% | +24.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.62% | 24.44% | +32.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.65% | 29.56% | +51.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.85% | 34.77% | +48.08% |
WEBL vs. DDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DDM's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. DDM - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than DDM's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and DDM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBL has higher volatility (15.48%) compared to DDM (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs DDM's -81.70%.
On 5-year performance, DDM leads with 12.66% vs -16.60% for WEBL. On fees, DDM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DDM has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DDM has performed better with a 12.66% return vs -16.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.19% for WEBL.
WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.95% for DDM.
DDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and DDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer