PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEAT vs. IAUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEAT vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEAT vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
14.32%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%14.75%
IAUM
iShares Gold Trust Micro
10.49%64.27%27.04%13.12%-0.49%3.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly higher than IAUM's 10.49% return.


WEAT

1D
-3.14%
1M
3.82%
YTD
14.32%
6M
10.56%
1Y
-3.26%
3Y*
-13.52%
5Y*
-5.06%
10Y*
-6.59%

IAUM

1D
1.71%
1M
-10.65%
YTD
10.49%
6M
23.22%
1Y
52.68%
3Y*
34.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEAT vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEAT vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUM
IAUM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IAUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IAUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEAT vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEATIAUMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.16

1.92

-2.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.10

2.35

-2.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.35

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.14

2.74

-2.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.22

10.02

-10.24

WEAT vs. IAUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the IAUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and IAUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEATIAUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

1.92

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

1.31

-1.72

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and IAUM is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

WEAT vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEAT nor IAUM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than IAUM's maximum drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and IAUM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEATIAUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.32%

-20.87%

-63.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.85%

-19.15%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.99%

-11.69%

-70.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.91%

-4.99%

-57.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.29%

5.23%

+6.06%

Volatility

WEAT vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 9.33%, while iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEATIAUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

10.38%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

24.00%

-9.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.24%

27.53%

-7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.49%

17.79%

+12.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

17.79%

+8.95%