WEAT vs. GSG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Index (TWEAT), while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WEAT returned -5.23%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for GSG. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.

Performance

WEAT vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 27.75% return. Over the past 10 years, WEAT has underperformed GSG with an annualized return of -5.23%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.90% annualized return.

WEAT

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: 5.75%
• 6M: 16.62%
• YTD: 18.78%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: -10.15%
• 5Y*: -5.12%
• 10Y*: -5.23%

GSG

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -4.84%
• 6M: 24.99%
• YTD: 27.75%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 6.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEAT vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	18.78%	-17.14%	-19.26%	-25.19%	7.98%	19.39%	5.81%	-1.35%	-1.17%	-12.79%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	27.75%	5.93%	8.52%	-5.51%	24.08%	38.77%	-23.94%	15.62%	-13.88%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and GSG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011	0.25

Return for Risk

WEAT vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEAT

WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 12
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 46
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEAT vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEAT	GSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.37	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	1.91	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.25	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	1.69	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.48	5.80	-5.32

WEAT vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEAT	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.32%	-89.62%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.44%	-18.81%	+4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.27%	-18.81%	-27.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.83%	-29.12%	-38.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.83%	-57.64%	-10.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.29%	-61.43%	-19.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.23%	-63.69%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.21%	5.45%	+2.76%

Volatility

WEAT vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) have volatilities of 6.35% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEAT	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.35%	6.34%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.74%	21.28%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.95%	23.22%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.33%	22.74%	+7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.77%	21.98%	+4.79%

WEAT vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEAT vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither WEAT nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEAT and GSG in my portfolio?

WEAT and GSG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEAT or GSG?

WEAT has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to GSG (6.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs GSG's -89.62%.

Which ETF is better, WEAT or GSG?

On 10-year performance, GSG leads with 6.90% vs -5.23% for WEAT. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEAT or GSG?

Over the 10-year period, GSG has performed better with a 6.90% return vs -5.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEAT or GSG?

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEAT or GSG?

WEAT and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WEAT and GSG?

WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while GSG is Commodities. WEAT tracks Teucrium Wheat Index (TWEAT), while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 0.75% for GSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.