WEAT vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
WEAT and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WEAT is a passively managed fund by Teucrium that tracks the performance of the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. It was launched on Sep 19, 2011. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both WEAT and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WEAT vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WEAT vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 18.03% | -17.14% | -19.26% | -25.19% | 7.98% | 19.39% | 5.81% | -1.35% | -4.20% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 8.57% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 18.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLDM's 8.57% return.
WEAT
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 0.73%
- 3Y*
- -12.60%
- 5Y*
- -4.45%
- 10Y*
- -6.29%
GLDM
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- 1Y
- 49.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WEAT vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
GLDM
WEAT vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEAT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 1.82 | -1.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.21 | 2.25 | -2.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | 2.71 | -2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.18 | 10.04 | -9.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEAT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 1.82 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 1.25 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 1.09 | -1.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and GLDM is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
WEAT vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither WEAT nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and GLDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -21.63% | -62.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -19.14% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | -20.92% | -46.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.41% | -13.19% | -68.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.90% | -6.04% | -56.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 5.16% | +6.13% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) is 8.69%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that WEAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 11.01% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.61% | 24.07% | -9.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 27.57% | -7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.47% | 17.65% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.73% | 16.77% | +9.96% |