WEAT vs. CLOB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and CLOB (VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while CLOB is a CLO fund actively managed by VanEck. WEAT is passively managed, while CLOB is actively managed. Over the past year, WEAT returned -4.80% vs 6.15% for CLOB. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CLOB.

Performance

WEAT vs. CLOB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than CLOB's 1.95% return.

WEAT

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -8.68%
• YTD: 12.27%
• 6M: 10.61%
• 1Y: -4.80%
• 3Y*: -14.72%
• 5Y*: -7.07%
• 10Y*: -6.28%

CLOB

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 6.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WEAT vs. CLOB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	12.27%	-17.14%	-7.13%
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	1.95%	6.94%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WEAT and CLOB is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	-0.09

The correlation between WEAT and CLOB shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WEAT vs. CLOB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEAT

WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 6
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CLOB

CLOB Risk / Return Rank: 72
CLOB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
CLOB Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CLOB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CLOB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CLOB Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEAT vs. CLOB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WEAT	CLOB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	2.10	-2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	3.02	-3.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.45	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	3.16	-3.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	13.58	-14.13

WEAT vs. CLOB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the CLOB Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEAT and CLOB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WEAT vs. CLOB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than CLOB's maximum drawdown of -5.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and CLOB.

Drawdown Indicators

	WEAT	CLOB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.32%	-5.54%	-78.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.31%	-1.96%	-12.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-67.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.31%	-0.19%	-82.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.17%	-0.30%	-62.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.64%	0.45%	+9.19%

Volatility

WEAT vs. CLOB - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF (CLOB) at 0.43%. This indicates that WEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WEAT	CLOB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.87%	0.43%	+4.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.17%	2.44%	+15.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.00%	2.95%	+19.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.44%	5.45%	+24.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.78%	5.45%	+21.33%

WEAT vs. CLOB - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOB's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

WEAT vs. CLOB - Dividend Comparison

WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLOB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CLOB VanEck AA-BB CLO ETF	6.42%	6.61%	1.65%
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WEAT and CLOB in my portfolio?

WEAT and CLOB have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WEAT or CLOB?

WEAT has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to CLOB (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs CLOB's -5.54%.

Which ETF is better, WEAT or CLOB?

On 1-year performance, CLOB leads with 6.15% vs -4.80% for WEAT. On fees, CLOB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, CLOB has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WEAT or CLOB?

Over the 1-year period, CLOB has performed better with a 6.15% return vs -4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WEAT or CLOB?

CLOB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WEAT or CLOB?

CLOB has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.

What is the main difference between WEAT and CLOB?

WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CLOB is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 0.45% for CLOB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.