PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDNA vs. WTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WDNA vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WDNA vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund
4.61%22.68%-14.18%-2.07%-26.29%-5.27%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.78%13.51%23.99%22.35%-8.06%6.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 4.61% return, which is significantly higher than WTV's 1.78% return.


WDNA

1D
1.57%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
4.61%
6M
13.11%
1Y
47.56%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
10Y*

WTV

1D
-0.31%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
1.78%
6M
4.75%
1Y
16.77%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WDNA vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WDNA vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDNA
WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

WTV
WTV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDNA vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDNAWTVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.93

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.42

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.21

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

1.29

+2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

5.61

+2.80

WDNA vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNA and WTV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDNAWTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.93

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.62

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between WDNA and WTV is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WDNA vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than WTV's 1.79% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund
4.37%4.57%0.75%0.80%0.38%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTV
WisdomTree US Value ETF
1.79%1.59%1.54%1.62%2.08%1.55%1.63%1.44%1.94%0.41%

Drawdowns

WDNA vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than WTV's maximum drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and WTV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WDNAWTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-42.18%

-16.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-13.20%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.67%

-5.71%

-26.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.79%

-5.13%

-30.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.18%

3.04%

+2.14%

Volatility

WDNA vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to WisdomTree US Value ETF (WTV) at 3.56%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WDNAWTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.62%

3.56%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.55%

8.77%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.62%

18.01%

+11.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.17%

17.14%

+8.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.17%

20.36%

+4.81%