WDNA vs. TRUH
WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. WDNA is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
WDNA vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WDNA
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 1Y
- 47.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.46%
- 5Y*
- -4.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.49%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K | |
| $25.97K | $30.05K | $24.07K |
WDNA vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 10.19% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDNA and TRUH is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDNA vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
WDNA
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WDNA vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.29 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDNA vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -4.51% | -54.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.81% | -2.75% | -23.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.30% | -1.64% | -33.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.03% | — | — |
Volatility
WDNA vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 17.62% | +7.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.26% | 17.62% | +7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 17.62% | +7.42% |
WDNA vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDNA vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 3.96% | 4.57% | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.38% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDNA and TRUH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.
WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for WDNA and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer