WDNA vs. GDMN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDNA is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. WDNA is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WDNA returned 4.46%/yr vs 52.64%/yr for GDMN. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

WDNA vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -22.58% return.

WDNA

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -7.98%
• 6M: 8.18%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 1Y: 47.46%
• 3Y*: 4.46%
• 5Y*: -4.37%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -3.49%

GDMN

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -5.95%
• 6M: -33.98%
• YTD: -22.58%
• 1Y: 46.98%
• 3Y*: 52.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	$1.53M	$2.31M	$3.48M
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund	$25.97K	$30.05K	$24.07K

WDNA vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund	15.26%	22.68%	-14.18%	-2.07%	-26.29%	-0.27%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-22.58%	237.09%	28.23%	12.97%	-14.62%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between WDNA and GDMN is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021	0.26

WDNA vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WDNA	GDMN
Healthcare	90.0%	-
Basic Materials	6.3%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	-
Energy	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WDNA vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WDNA

WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 80
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 33
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WDNA vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDNA	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	0.82	+1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	1.32	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	1.02	+2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	2.14	+7.15

WDNA vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNA and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDNA vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDNA	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.87%	-52.82%	-6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.70%	-52.02%	+40.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.65%	-52.02%	+15.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.81%	-49.17%	+23.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.30%	-19.83%	-15.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	24.76%	-19.73%

Volatility

WDNA vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) is 7.04%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 15.83%. This indicates that WDNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDNA	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	15.83%	-8.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.23%	54.36%	-37.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.54%	65.01%	-39.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.26%	48.35%	-23.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.04%	48.35%	-23.31%

WDNA vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WDNA and GDMN have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

WDNA vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than GDMN's 3.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	3.49%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%	0.00%
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund	3.96%	4.57%	0.75%	0.80%	0.38%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDNA and GDMN in my portfolio?

WDNA and GDMN have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDNA or GDMN?

GDMN has higher volatility (15.83%) compared to WDNA (7.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDNA dropped -58.87% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

Which ETF is better, WDNA or GDMN?

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 52.64% vs 4.46% for WDNA. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, WDNA has been the lower-risk option at 7.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WDNA or GDMN?

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 52.64% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDNA or GDMN?

WDNA and GDMN have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDNA or GDMN?

WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.49% for GDMN.

What is the main difference between WDNA and GDMN?

WDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GDMN is Commodities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.