PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WDNA vs. DHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WDNA vs. DHS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDNA is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDNA returned -5.03%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for DHS. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.

Performance

WDNA vs. DHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly higher than DHS's 12.61% return.

WDNA

1D
0.49%
1M
8.93%
YTD
13.32%
6M
11.11%
1Y
50.90%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
-5.03%
10Y*
—

DHS

1D
0.81%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
12.61%
6M
12.50%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDNA vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund		13.32%22.68%-14.18%-2.07%-26.29%-4.92%
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund		12.61%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%5.57%

Correlation

The correlation between WDNA and DHS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021

0.50

The correlation between WDNA and DHS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WDNA vs. DHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WDNA
DHS

Healthcare

85.0%
14.9%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
18.5%

Energy

1.1%
8.8%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

22.1%

Industrials

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

2.9%

Technology

-

4.1%

Utilities

-

8.7%

Healthcare

WDNA
85.0%
DHS
14.9%

Basic Materials

WDNA
6.5%
DHS
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

WDNA
3.0%
DHS
18.5%

Energy

WDNA
1.1%
DHS
8.8%

Communication Services

WDNA

-

DHS
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

WDNA

-

DHS
5.6%

Financial Services

WDNA

-

DHS
22.1%

Industrials

WDNA

-

DHS
4.2%

Real Estate

WDNA

-

DHS
2.9%

Technology

WDNA

-

DHS
4.1%

Utilities

WDNA

-

DHS
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund

WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund

Often compared with WDNA:
WDNA vs. BBPWDNA vs. AGNGWDNA vs. HELXWDNA vs. IDNAWDNA vs. IBBQWDNA vs. XBIWDNA vs. SCHG
Often compared with DHS:
DHS vs. SCHDDHS vs. SPHDDHS vs. DGRODHS vs. JEPIDHS vs. FDVVDHS vs. DTDDHS vs. SPY

Return for Risk

WDNA vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WDNA
WDNA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
WDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
WDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDNA vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

WDNADHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
2.21

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.81
3.27

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

3.57

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

12.96

-3.16

WDNA vs. DHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the DHS Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDNA and DHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDNA vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and DHS.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WDNADHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.87%

-67.25%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-6.30%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.25%

-11.87%

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.87%

-15.28%

-43.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-37.35%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.05%

-1.19%

-25.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.56%

-9.53%

-26.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

1.73%

+3.48%

Volatility

WDNA vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) at 3.61%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WDNADHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

3.61%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

7.53%

+9.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.90%

10.20%

+15.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.14%

13.88%

+11.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

16.08%

+8.98%

WDNA vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDNA vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison

WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than DHS's 3.27% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund		3.27%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
WDNA
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund		4.03%4.57%0.75%0.80%0.38%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

WDNA and DHS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDNA has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to DHS (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDNA dropped -58.87% vs DHS's -67.25%.

On 5-year performance, DHS leads with 11.73% vs -5.03% for WDNA. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DHS has performed better with a 11.73% return vs -5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDNA.

WDNA has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 3.27% for DHS.

WDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. WDNA tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.38% for DHS.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDNA and DHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer