WDNA vs. COMT
WDNA (WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDNA is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDNA returned -3.51%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for COMT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDNA charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
WDNA vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDNA achieves a 17.51% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
WDNA
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 1Y
- 47.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- -3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
WDNA vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 17.51% | 22.68% | -14.18% | -2.07% | -26.29% | -4.92% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 7.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDNA and COMT is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between WDNA and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDNA vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
WDNA
COMT
WDNA vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDNA | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 1.90 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 6.35 | +2.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDNA vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDNA drawdown since its inception was -58.87%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDNA and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDNA | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.87% | -51.89% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -17.57% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.25% | -17.57% | -20.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.87% | -29.00% | -29.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.36% | -11.28% | -13.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -23.95% | -11.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 5.24% | 0.00% |
Volatility
WDNA vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund (WDNA) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.91%. This indicates that WDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDNA | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.75% | 5.91% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.32% | 19.67% | -2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.80% | 21.54% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 21.20% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 18.85% | +6.21% |
WDNA vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDNA has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDNA vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
WDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
WDNA WisdomTree BioRevolution Fund | 3.89% | 4.57% | 0.75% | 0.80% | 0.38% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDNA and COMT have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDNA has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to COMT (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDNA dropped -58.87% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 5-year performance, COMT leads with 11.75% vs -3.51% for WDNA. On fees, WDNA is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COMT has performed better with a 11.75% return vs -3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDNA is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 3.89% for WDNA.
WDNA is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while COMT is Commodities. WDNA tracks WisdomTree BioRevolution Index, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDNA and 0.48% for COMT.
WDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDNA and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer