PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WDIV having a 13.12% return and VXUS slightly lower at 12.75%. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 7.59%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.44% annualized return.


WDIV

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.48%
6M
7.94%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
24.19%
3Y*
17.63%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
7.24%

VXUS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.29%
6M
6.78%
YTD
12.75%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$362.62M$406.11M$507.75M
$1.02M$920.01K$626.08K

WDIV vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
13.12%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
12.75%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and VXUS is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013

0.86

The correlation between WDIV and VXUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WDIV vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
VXUS

Financial Services

22.5%
23.2%

Utilities

13.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

12.8%
1.7%

Industrials

11.8%
14.5%

Communication Services

9.4%
3.8%

Energy

7.1%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
4.8%

Technology

4.6%
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
6.8%

Healthcare

3.9%
6.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
6.6%

Financial Services

WDIV
22.5%
VXUS
23.2%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
VXUS
2.9%

Real Estate

WDIV
12.8%
VXUS
1.7%

Industrials

WDIV
11.8%
VXUS
14.5%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.4%
VXUS
3.8%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
VXUS
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.6%
VXUS
4.8%

Technology

WDIV
4.6%
VXUS
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
4.2%
VXUS
6.8%

Healthcare

WDIV
3.9%
VXUS
6.8%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.4%
VXUS
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WDIV vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDIVVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.30

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.42

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.25

8.87

+1.38

WDIV vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-35.97%

-6.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-11.27%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-13.58%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-29.44%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-35.97%

-6.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.84%

+1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-8.16%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

3.07%

-0.76%

Volatility

WDIV vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.48%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

5.29%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.34%

15.06%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

16.86%

-6.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

16.35%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

17.03%

-1.89%

WDIV vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than VXUS's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.59%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.10%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and VXUS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to WDIV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 9.44% vs 7.59% for WDIV. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 9.44% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 2.59% for VXUS.

WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.05% for VXUS.

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer