PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WDIV vs. GLBL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WDIV vs. GLBL.L

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and GLBL.L (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while GLBL.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WDIV returned 7.47%/yr vs -1.91%/yr for GLBL.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLBL.L.

Performance

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WDIV is traded in USD, while GLBL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLBL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than GLBL.L's -0.95% return.

WDIV

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
7.69%
6M
9.59%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
7.47%
10Y*
7.23%

GLBL.L

1D
-0.80%
1M
-1.57%
YTD
-0.95%
6M
-0.28%
1Y
1.84%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
-1.91%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF		7.69%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-12.61%
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged		-0.95%8.25%-1.64%4.83%-16.04%-4.83%8.54%7.45%-31.22%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and GLBL.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2018

0.29

Over the past year, WDIV and GLBL.L have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WDIV
GLBL.L

Financial Services

23.1%
12.8%

Utilities

13.8%
1.3%

Real Estate

13.3%
0.0%

Industrials

12.1%
1.2%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.2%

Energy

7.1%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
0.3%

Healthcare

4.6%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
1.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
0.2%

Technology

2.9%
0.8%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
GLBL.L
12.8%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
GLBL.L
1.3%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
GLBL.L
0.0%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
GLBL.L
1.2%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
GLBL.L
3.2%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
GLBL.L
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
GLBL.L
0.3%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
GLBL.L
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
GLBL.L
1.3%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
GLBL.L
0.2%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
GLBL.L
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF

SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged

Often compared with WDIV:
WDIV vs. SCHDWDIV vs. SCHYWDIV vs. VYMWDIV vs. WLDRWDIV vs. VIGIWDIV vs. SPYWDIV vs. IVV
Often compared with GLBL.L:
GLBL.L vs. SHLDGLBL.L vs. GAGG.LGLBL.L vs. GLAD.LGLBL.L vs. GLAU.LGLBL.L vs. PRIG.LGLBL.L vs. GLAB.LGLBL.L vs. AGHG.L

Return for Risk

WDIV vs. GLBL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
GLBL.L
GLBL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLBL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WDIVGLBL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.04
0.26

+1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.93
0.42

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.05

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

0.38

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

1.08

+7.87

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the GLBL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and GLBL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WDIVGLBL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

0.26

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

-0.26

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

-0.33

+0.79

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, roughly equal to the maximum GLBL.L drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and GLBL.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WDIVGLBL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-40.58%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-3.96%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-7.06%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-24.63%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-29.15%

+27.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-29.66%

+23.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.41%

+0.93%

Volatility

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged (GLBL.L) at 1.85%. This indicates that WDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLBL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WDIVGLBL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.85%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

4.35%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.26%

5.70%

+4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

7.47%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.39%

12.17%

+3.22%

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GLBL.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDIV vs. GLBL.L - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than GLBL.L's 3.15% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLBL.L
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond UCITS USD unhedged		3.15%3.14%2.76%2.05%1.39%1.22%1.54%1.67%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF		4.06%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

WDIV and GLBL.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLBL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLBL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.

WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while GLBL.L is Global Bonds. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while GLBL.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.10% for GLBL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and GLBL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer