WDIV vs. DIVD
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and DIVD (Altrius Global Dividend ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WDIV is passively managed, while DIVD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WDIV returned 17.73%/yr vs 17.29%/yr for DIVD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for DIVD.
Performance
WDIV vs. DIVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly lower than DIVD's 15.56% return.
WDIV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 9.77%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
DIVD
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 17.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDIV vs. DIVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 12.31% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | 10.94% |
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF | 15.56% | 26.18% | 2.52% | 14.27% | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and DIVD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.83 |
The correlation between WDIV and DIVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
WDIV vs. DIVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDIV
DIVD
Financial Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
WDIV
DIVD
Real Estate
WDIV
DIVD
Utilities
WDIV
DIVD
-
Energy
WDIV
DIVD
Industrials
WDIV
DIVD
Communication Services
WDIV
DIVD
Consumer Defensive
WDIV
DIVD
Basic Materials
WDIV
DIVD
Consumer Cyclical
WDIV
DIVD
Healthcare
WDIV
DIVD
Technology
WDIV
DIVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. DIVD — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
DIVD
WDIV vs. DIVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDIV | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 3.90 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.42 | 14.32 | -4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. DIVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, which is greater than DIVD's maximum drawdown of -13.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and DIVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -13.88% | -28.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -6.70% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -13.88% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -2.18% | -3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.82% | +0.53% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. DIVD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.47%, while Altrius Global Dividend ETF (DIVD) has a volatility of 3.28%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | DIVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 3.28% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 8.46% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.16% | 11.35% | -1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 13.21% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 13.21% | +1.93% |
WDIV vs. DIVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVD's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. DIVD - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than DIVD's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVD Altrius Global Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 2.86% | 3.39% | 2.96% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.13% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and DIVD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVD has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to WDIV (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs DIVD's -13.88%.
On 3-year performance, WDIV leads with 17.73% vs 17.29% for DIVD. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WDIV has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 17.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DIVD.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.68% for DIVD.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Altrius. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.49% for DIVD.
DIVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and DIVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer