WDGF vs. XAR
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index while XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
WDGF vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 2.92% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 9.86% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- 6M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XAR
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 29.11%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 17.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $47.19K | $44.58K | $156.04K | |
| $64.82M | $59.56M | $61.10M |
WDGF vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 2.92% | -0.39% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.86% | 9.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and XAR is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XAR
WDGF vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDGF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -18.00%, smaller than the maximum XAR drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.00% | -46.37% | +28.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.87% | -9.47% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -6.78% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.61% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 28.75% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 23.84% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.80% | 24.85% | -2.05% |
WDGF vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDGF and XAR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDGF.
XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.35% for XAR.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer