WDGF vs. COPX
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDGF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for COPX.
Performance
WDGF vs. COPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than COPX's 25.71% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 8.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPX
- 1D
- -3.64%
- 1M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 25.71%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.95%
WDGF vs. COPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 3.03% | -0.25% |
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.71% | 37.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and COPX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. COPX — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
COPX
WDGF vs. COPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDGF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.19 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. COPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum COPX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and COPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -83.16% | +68.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -65.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -5.69% | -7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -39.30% | +33.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.66% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. COPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | COPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 41.41% | -19.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 36.51% | -14.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 35.55% | -13.14% |
WDGF vs. COPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than COPX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. COPX - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than COPX's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDGF and COPX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while COPX is Materials. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.65% for COPX.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and COPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer