PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDAF vs. XDEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WDAF vs. XDEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WDAF vs. XDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


WDAF

1D
3.09%
1M
-8.09%
YTD
11.28%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDEF

1D
5.06%
1M
-8.83%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WDAF vs. XDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEF's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WDAF vs. XDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Xtrackers Europe Defense Technologies ETF (XDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WDAF vs. XDEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDAFXDEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.49

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between WDAF and XDEF is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WDAF vs. XDEF - Dividend Comparison

WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while XDEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

WDAF vs. XDEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum XDEF drawdown of -99.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and XDEF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WDAFXDEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-99.27%

+81.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-99.23%

+83.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.94%

-49.34%

+43.40%

Volatility

WDAF vs. XDEF - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WDAFXDEFDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.89%

205.45%

-175.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.89%

205.45%

-175.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

205.45%

-175.56%