WDAF vs. QGRW
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while QGRW is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
WDAF vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 13.60% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QGRW
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 12.72%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 26.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.72M | $14.19M | $19.88M | |
| $216.97K | $187.82K | $494.71K |
WDAF vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 1.82% | -7.71% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 13.60% | 4.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and QGRW is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QGRW
WDAF vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDAF | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -24.40% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.59% | -2.89% | -20.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.53% | -3.34% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.51% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.45% | 19.53% | +13.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 21.26% | +12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.45% | 21.26% | +12.19% |
WDAF vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and QGRW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QGRW is Quality Factor. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.28% for QGRW.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer