WDAF vs. ISCMF
WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.
Performance
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCMF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- 1Y
- 37.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 22.87% | 11.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDAF and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDAF vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank
WDAF
ISCMF
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDAF | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.45 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum ISCMF drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and ISCMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDAF | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -25.42% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.06% | -5.26% | -10.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -13.43% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.42% | — |
Volatility
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDAF | ISCMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.10% | 18.53% | +13.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 14.38% | +17.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 14.38% | +17.72% |
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDAF vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison
WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while ISCMF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDAF and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
WDAF has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for ISCMF.
WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while ISCMF is Commodities. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.19% for ISCMF.
Find the right allocation for WDAF and ISCMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer