WDAF vs. FOWF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDAF is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. WDAF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.

Performance

WDAF vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDAF achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than FOWF's 16.05% return.

WDAF

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -7.97%
• 6M: -12.60%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

FOWF

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: 4.76%
• 6M: 7.86%
• YTD: 16.05%
• 1Y: 23.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	$21.21K	$63.68K	$90.22K
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund	$216.97K	$187.82K	$494.71K

WDAF vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund	1.82%	-7.71%
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	16.05%	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WDAF and FOWF is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

WDAF vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WDAF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FOWF

FOWF Risk / Return Rank: 60
FOWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FOWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FOWF Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FOWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FOWF Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WDAF vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDAF	FOWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.35	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.98	—

Drawdowns

WDAF vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDAF drawdown since its inception was -28.19%, which is greater than FOWF's maximum drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDAF and FOWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDAF	FOWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.19%	-12.29%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.59%	0.00%	-23.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.53%	-2.15%	-6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WDAF	FOWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.45%	14.84%	+18.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.45%	16.84%	+16.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.45%	16.84%	+16.61%

WDAF vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDAF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDAF vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison

WDAF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than FOWF's 0.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF	0.71%	0.79%
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund	0.13%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDAF and FOWF in my portfolio?

WDAF and FOWF have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WDAF or FOWF?

On fees, WDAF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDAF or FOWF?

WDAF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FOWF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDAF or FOWF?

FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.13% for WDAF.

What is the main difference between WDAF and FOWF?

WDAF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FOWF is Industrials Equities. WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDAF and 0.49% for FOWF.