WCQGX vs. CHILX
WCQGX (WCM China Quality Growth Fund) and CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WCQGX returned -7.32%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for CHILX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WCQGX charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHILX.
Performance
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCQGX achieves a 8.59% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 13.53% return.
WCQGX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 19.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.53%
- 5Y*
- -7.32%
- 10Y*
- —
CHILX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 17.77%
- 1Y
- 40.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund | 8.59% | 20.97% | -3.03% | -18.49% | -26.70% | 4.03% | 64.08% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 13.53% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 65.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCQGX and CHILX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between WCQGX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCQGX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank
WCQGX
CHILX
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCQGX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.44 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 4.90 | -3.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 15.73 | -12.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCQGX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 2.54 | -1.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.03 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCQGX drawdown since its inception was -59.28%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCQGX and CHILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCQGX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.28% | -47.73% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -8.54% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.53% | -22.59% | -5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.82% | -43.88% | -13.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.43% | -5.02% | -32.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.30% | -20.46% | -13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 2.66% | +3.93% |
Volatility
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison
WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) at 6.05%. This indicates that WCQGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCQGX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.43% | 6.05% | +3.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 11.86% | +4.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.03% | 16.51% | +5.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 20.27% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 21.83% | +2.09% |
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCQGX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCQGX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison
WCQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.14%, more than CHILX's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.59% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% |
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund | 6.14% | 6.67% | 2.02% | 0.82% | 0.28% | 8.54% | 2.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WCQGX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCQGX has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to CHILX (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCQGX dropped -59.28% vs CHILX's -47.73%.
CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WCQGX and CHILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer