PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCPNX vs. FSAHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) and Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCPNX achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FSAHX's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WCPNX has underperformed FSAHX with an annualized return of 3.17%, while FSAHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.50% annualized return.


WCPNX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
0.27%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
3.17%

FSAHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.05%
YTD
2.62%
6M
3.15%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*
4.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCPNX
Weitz Core Plus Income Fund
0.27%7.89%4.10%7.00%-9.92%1.60%10.18%7.39%1.49%2.83%
FSAHX
Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund
2.62%7.75%7.74%10.29%-7.06%2.78%3.69%9.32%-1.24%4.96%

Correlation

The correlation between WCPNX and FSAHX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014

0.30

Over the past year, WCPNX and FSAHX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCPNX vs. FSAHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCPNX
WCPNX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
WCPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WCPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FSAHX
FSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) and Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCPNXFSAHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.72

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

4.75

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

25.31

-19.51

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the FSAHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCPNX and FSAHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCPNXFSAHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.84

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

1.14

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

1.06

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.90

-0.06

Drawdowns

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCPNX drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum FSAHX drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPNX and FSAHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCPNXFSAHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-16.77%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-1.78%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.17%

-3.30%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.63%

-9.43%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.63%

-16.77%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.44%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-1.55%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.33%

+0.55%

Volatility

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Volatility Comparison

Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) at 0.83%. This indicates that WCPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSAHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCPNXFSAHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.83%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.24%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

2.98%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

3.87%

+1.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

4.25%

-0.08%

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCPNX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FSAHX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCPNX vs. FSAHX - Dividend Comparison

WCPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than FSAHX's 7.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAHX
Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund
7.31%7.36%6.08%5.97%3.26%2.85%3.19%4.22%4.52%4.11%4.73%4.40%
WCPNX
Weitz Core Plus Income Fund
4.92%5.26%6.15%4.92%3.04%2.51%5.07%2.95%2.55%2.41%3.72%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCPNX and FSAHX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCPNX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to FSAHX (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCPNX dropped -13.63% vs FSAHX's -16.77%.

FSAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCPNX and FSAHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer