PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCPNX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCPNX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WCPNX has outperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 3.24%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.


WCPNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.63%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.90%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
3.24%

FTHRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.22%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCPNX
Weitz Core Plus Income Fund
0.80%7.89%4.10%7.00%-9.92%1.60%10.18%7.39%1.49%2.83%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.15%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between WCPNX and FTHRX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014

0.85

The correlation between WCPNX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCPNX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCPNX
WCPNX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WCPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
WCPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCPNXFTHRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.59

1.44

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

2.26

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.92

+0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.86

5.74

+1.12

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCPNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCPNX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCPNXFTHRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.44

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.27

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.91

-0.06

Drawdowns

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCPNX drawdown since its inception was -13.63%, smaller than the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPNX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCPNXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-19.01%

+5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.11%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.17%

-2.68%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.63%

-13.18%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.63%

-13.25%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-1.09%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.18%

-3.07%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.70%

+0.17%

Volatility

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

Weitz Core Plus Income Fund (WCPNX) has a higher volatility of 1.33% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.91%. This indicates that WCPNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCPNXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

0.91%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.02%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

2.81%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.00%

4.03%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

3.40%

+0.77%

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCPNX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCPNX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

WCPNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, more than FTHRX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.69%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
WCPNX
Weitz Core Plus Income Fund
4.89%5.26%6.15%4.92%3.04%2.51%5.07%2.95%2.55%2.41%3.72%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, WCPNX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WCPNX has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to FTHRX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCPNX dropped -13.63% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

WCPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCPNX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer