PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAHX vs. FXNAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAHX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than FXNAX's 0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAHX has outperformed FXNAX with an annualized return of 4.61%, while FXNAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.44% annualized return.


FSAHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.61%
YTD
2.96%
6M
3.47%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
4.61%

FXNAX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.11%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.25%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAHX
Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund
2.96%7.75%7.74%10.29%-7.06%2.78%3.69%9.32%-1.24%4.96%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
0.11%7.14%1.35%5.82%-13.55%-2.10%7.63%8.50%0.04%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAHX and FXNAX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2013

0.24

Over the past year, FSAHX and FXNAX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.24, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAHX vs. FXNAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAHX
FSAHX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FSAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FXNAX
FXNAX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FXNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FXNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) and Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSAHXFXNAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.20

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.89

1.52

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.70

4.36

+21.34

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the FXNAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAHX and FXNAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAHX drawdown since its inception was -16.77%, smaller than the maximum FXNAX drawdown of -19.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAHX and FXNAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAHXFXNAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-19.51%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

-2.94%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.30%

-6.16%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-18.54%

+9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.77%

-19.51%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.17%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-3.86%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

1.02%

-0.68%

Volatility

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund (FSAHX) is 0.77%, while Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund (FXNAX) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that FSAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXNAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAHXFXNAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.16%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

2.90%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

3.92%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

6.08%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

5.01%

-0.76%

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FXNAX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAHX vs. FXNAX - Dividend Comparison

FSAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than FXNAX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAHX
Fidelity Short Duration High Income Fund
7.29%7.36%6.08%5.97%3.26%2.85%3.19%4.22%4.52%4.11%4.73%4.40%
FXNAX
Fidelity U.S. Bond Index Fund
3.72%3.58%3.40%3.15%1.81%1.74%2.92%2.68%2.74%2.57%2.76%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAHX and FXNAX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FXNAX has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to FSAHX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAHX dropped -16.77% vs FXNAX's -19.51%.

FSAHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAHX and FXNAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer