PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCPIX vs. FNPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCPIX achieves a -8.71% return, which is significantly higher than FNPIX's -12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, WCPIX has outperformed FNPIX with an annualized return of 16.91%, while FNPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.21% annualized return.


WCPIX

1D
-2.05%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-8.71%
6M
-6.32%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
16.91%

FNPIX

1D
-1.85%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-12.01%
6M
-9.13%
1Y
-2.81%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
13.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
-8.71%28.70%47.44%78.07%-54.07%25.49%33.81%21.51%22.32%-1.70%
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
-12.01%16.39%38.51%18.34%-23.84%57.11%-9.83%46.49%-17.23%27.19%

Correlation

The correlation between WCPIX and FNPIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2000

0.52

The correlation between WCPIX and FNPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCPIX vs. FNPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCPIX
WCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FNPIX
FNPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FNPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FNPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCPIXFNPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.99

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

-0.16

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

-0.40

+2.68

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the FNPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCPIX and FNPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCPIXFNPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

-0.17

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.28

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.43

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.10

-0.09

Drawdowns

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than FNPIX's maximum drawdown of -93.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPIX and FNPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCPIXFNPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.94%

-93.14%

-5.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.09%

-22.37%

+6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.29%

-23.21%

-53.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.29%

-37.80%

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.29%

-58.23%

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.59%

-15.74%

-58.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.49%

-36.22%

-50.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

9.00%

-3.72%

Volatility

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Volatility Comparison

Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund (FNPIX) at 4.82%. This indicates that WCPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCPIXFNPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

4.82%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

16.28%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.89%

21.45%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.06%

27.38%

+107.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.30%

30.65%

+67.65%

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FNPIX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCPIX vs. FNPIX - Dividend Comparison

WCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, while FNPIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FNPIX
ProFunds Financials UltraSector Fund
0.00%0.00%0.49%0.25%0.00%13.10%0.00%1.70%
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
1.53%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.15%0.00%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCPIX and FNPIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCPIX has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to FNPIX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCPIX dropped -98.94% vs FNPIX's -93.14%.

WCPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCPIX and FNPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer