PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCPIX vs. BMPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCPIX achieves a -6.80% return, which is significantly lower than BMPIX's 19.15% return. Over the past 10 years, WCPIX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 17.16%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.29% annualized return.


WCPIX

1D
-2.66%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
-6.80%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
14.33%
3Y*
28.73%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
17.16%

BMPIX

1D
1.71%
1M
2.12%
YTD
19.15%
6M
23.02%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
11.58%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
-6.80%28.70%47.44%78.07%-54.07%25.49%33.81%21.51%22.32%-1.70%
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
19.15%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%

Correlation

The correlation between WCPIX and BMPIX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2001

0.49

The correlation between WCPIX and BMPIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCPIX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCPIX
WCPIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
WCPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WCPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WCPIXBMPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.70

1.04

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.13

1.56

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

1.42

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.64

4.04

-1.40

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the BMPIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCPIX and BMPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WCPIXBMPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.04

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.14

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

0.32

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.17

-0.16

Drawdowns

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCPIX drawdown since its inception was -98.94%, which is greater than BMPIX's maximum drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCPIX and BMPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCPIXBMPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.94%

-84.22%

-14.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.09%

-18.38%

+2.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.29%

-34.54%

-41.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.29%

-38.50%

-37.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.29%

-61.41%

-14.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.06%

-6.79%

-67.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.49%

-24.12%

-62.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

6.45%

-1.22%

Volatility

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services UltraSector ProFund (WCPIX) is 5.30%, while ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that WCPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCPIXBMPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

8.89%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.27%

19.25%

-4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.78%

25.13%

-5.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

135.05%

29.56%

+105.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

98.31%

32.10%

+66.21%

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCPIX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCPIX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison

WCPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than BMPIX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.52%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
WCPIX
Communication Services UltraSector ProFund
1.50%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.15%0.00%2.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCPIX and BMPIX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMPIX has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to WCPIX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCPIX dropped -98.94% vs BMPIX's -84.22%.

BMPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCPIX and BMPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer